webex
Interesting move by Microsoft to provide free web conferencing hosted on their Windows Live platform. This is something I thought Google should have been providing all along but, for some reason, don't seem interested in doing so. I haven't played with Tahiti yet but reading through the online documentation reveals many familiar features. In my opinion, application screen sharing is the heart of interactive digital collaboration. Forget about video conferencing, most situations don't require it and it just gets in the way. With Tahiti you and a handful of colleagues can work together in real-time by manipulating and viewing the same computer screen. Imagine your small team (maybe it is just two of you) sitting at their desks anywhere in the world working with the same application; even passing control of the mouse and keyboard around. A really cool feature Tahiti looks to provide is remote copy/paste. So instead of your partner emailing a spreadsheet to you and talking you through transferring that complex formula she developed, you pass control of Excel running on your computer to her. Once her keyboard and mouse is controlling your instance of Excel running on your computer she can copy (as in Edit/Copy) the formula from a version of Excel running on her computer and then paste it into the Excel spreadsheet she is now controlling on your computer. Viola, your spreadsheet is updated. In many cases I think working together this way is more effective than meeting in person. Everyone gets their own keyboard, their own mouse, and their own screen to comfortably view. Actually, I have been in many situations where a small team, crashing on a hot assignment and cloistered in a conference room, fire up NetMeeting to actively exchange information while working on a document, even though they are in the same room. Of course, you will need a voice connection along with Tahiti but cell calls are cheap these days and there is always Skype. In my opinion, this could mainstream web conferencing better than Webex could ever have hoped. The limit of fifteen users per session is very reasonable. Its been my experience that almost all of these type of conferences involve 3 or less participants. This is further proof that WebEx's timing was perfect again.
Source: Microsoft Screen Sharing Software - Simple, Yet Powerful at Digital Inspiration |
|||
Last week BusinessWeek's Rob Hof asked "What Did Cisco's $3.2 Billion for WebEx Buy?" Rob's choices were:
I just posted a blog on Collaboration Loop about the deal. My view is closer to Arrington's, but for different reasons. Update: My Collaboration Loop posts have been moved over to the Enterprise 2.0 Blog. The link above has been changed to point to the new location. |
|||